The upcoming Pectra and Fusaka updates for Ethereum will reshape its operational landscape during 2025

Ethereum experiences rising competition from Solana and BNB Smart Chain in April 2025 because these competitors lead in decentralized exchange (DEX) transactions and generate higher fees than Ethereum does. The blockchain encounters greater risks because Layer 2 expansion together with developer fragmentation and high transaction costs have reduced base layer value accrual while making the blockchain more unstable.

Ethereum will implement Pectra and Fusaka during its upcoming mainnet deployments which are scheduled for May 2025 and late 2025. The new update exclusively targets network scalability and L2 capabilities but makes no progress toward enhancing electronically comparable money or network protection from censorship.

What’s in the Pectra Upgrade?

Pectra develops its functionality through three essential main features that include staking functions and blob capacity and account abstraction systems.

• Staking (EIP-7251): The upcoming update will increase validator effective balance limits between 32 ETH to 2,048 ETH. The new update seeks to enhance network functionality by gathering staked assets into fewer validators among the current active one million validators.
• Blobs (EIP-7691): The improved blob management system increases Ethereum’s data posting abilities by two-fold. The enhancement of blob operations within the protocol will achieve higher throughput rates through a growing target number of blobs from 3 to 6 together with a maximum increase from 6 to 9. These modifications will sustain low L1 transaction expenses.
• Account Abstraction (EIP-7702): Smart contract-based wallets in Ethereum will replace EOAs through improvements that enable transaction bundling and gas sponsorships in addition to social recovery protocols. A significant evolution of user experience together with security enhancements occurs in this development.

What to Expect from Fusaka?

Rose Fusaka provides an expansive analysis of Ethereum through its roles as a data availability (DA) scaling platform and improved virtual machine capabilities.

• Toward Full Danksharding (EIP-7594): The PeerDAS project implements early data availability sampling techniques which serve as vital components to achieve danksharding capabilities in Ethereum. Thus L2s will reach enhanced data processing power.
• EVM Enhancements: Smart contracts will benefit from the Ethereum Object Format because it features a clean and organized design system. Los runtime resources would decrease while developer tooling and security would enhance themselves through this improvement.

Scaling L2s: An Opportunity with Risks

Ethereum stands firm in its L2 scaling initiatives which result in both positive and negative aspects. Through this approach the system protects both future growth and higher transaction processing capabilities. The data availability layer role of Ethereum encounters validation issues because of its unclear value accrual and functional viability.

The existing competitors Celestia and EigenDA and NearDA provide data processing capabilities at higher speeds and lower cost to users. Ethereum keeps its security position as the leading priority but needs significant improvements to achieve better performance benchmarks.

The Value Accrual Challenge

Experts continue to question the mechanisms by which Ethereum will maintain value growth for its Ether cryptocurrency (ETH). Several proposals include:

• Repricing the blob market: Could inadvertently drive L2s toward cheaper alternatives.

• Requiring L2s to return a share of fees to Ethereum: While potentially effective, this approach is difficult to enforce uniformly.

• Supporting based rollups: These inherently support ETH value accrual but are not prioritized in current development plans.

Ethereum positions its development path with Pectra and Fusaka to establish its future operation through an advancement of its position within the modular blockchain framework. The path towards long-term leadership remains unclear as it depends on the ability of the network to overcome technical and competitive challenges.

To read full report, please click here.